08 November 2006

Newcastle leads the way

Newcastle Council has had a history of leading the way on a variety of issues of importance to our community.

Newcastle was the first Council in NSW to ban smoking in restaurants - after some time the State Government passed state-wide legislation following suit - recently the Council banned smoking in outdoor dining areas.

Newcastle Council was the first council to:

* have a commitment to indigenous people

* ban the use of rainforest timbers in building work

* (one of the first to) institute a nuclear free zone in the LGA

* ban wild animals in circuses coming to the city

* include social, environmental and industrial relations performance as part of council's tendering process

* develop an integrated waste management strategy, including a target for the phased elimination of waste to landfill (approach subsequently adopted by the ACT Government)

* adopt a local Agenda 21, described in the blueprint for sustainability that was agreed at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development in 1992 (the Rio Earth Summit).

For the record

The Newcastle City Council vote for the six part climate change motion was as follow:

1. For: Michael Osborne (Greens), Keith Parsons (Greens), Ian McKenzie (Greens), Cassandra Arnold (Greens), Helene O'Neill (Ind), Marylin Eade (ALP), Paul Scobie (ALP)
Against: John Tate (Ind), Gwen Jackson (Ind), Barry Scully (Ind)
Absent: Aaron Buman (Ind), Barbara Gaudry (ALP), Sonia Hornery (ALP)

2. For: Michael Osborne (Greens), Keith Parsons (Greens), Ian McKenzie (Greens), Cassandra Arnold (Greens), Helene O'Neill (Ind), John Tate (Ind), Marylin Eade (ALP), Paul Scobie (ALP)
Against: Gwen Jackson (Ind), Barry Scully (Ind)
Absent: Aaron Buman (Ind), Barbara Gaudry (ALP), Sonia Hornery (ALP)

3. For: Michael Osborne (Greens), Keith Parsons (Greens), Ian McKenzie (Greens), Cassandra Arnold (Greens), Marylin Eade (ALP), Paul Scobie (ALP)
Against: Helene O'Neill (Ind), John Tate (Ind), Gwen Jackson (Ind), Barry Scully (Ind)
Absent: Aaron Buman (Ind), Barbara Gaudry (ALP), Sonia Hornery (ALP)

4. For: Michael Osborne (Greens), Keith Parsons (Greens), Ian McKenzie (Greens), Cassandra Arnold (Greens), Helene O'Neill (Ind), John Tate (Ind), Gwen Jackson (Ind), Barry Scully (Ind), Marylin Eade (ALP), Paul Scobie (ALP)
Against: -
Absent: Aaron Buman (Ind), Barbara Gaudry (ALP), Sonia Hornery (ALP)

5. For: Michael Osborne (Greens), Keith Parsons (Greens), Ian McKenzie (Greens), Cassandra Arnold (Greens), Helene O'Neill (Ind), John Tate (Ind), Gwen Jackson (Ind), Barry Scully (Ind), Marylin Eade (ALP), Paul Scobie (ALP)
Against: -
Absent: Aaron Buman (Ind), Barbara Gaudry (ALP), Sonia Hornery (ALP)

6. For: Michael Osborne (Greens), Keith Parsons (Greens), Ian McKenzie (Greens), Cassandra Arnold (Greens), Helene O'Neill (Ind), John Tate (Ind), Gwen Jackson (Ind), Barry Scully (Ind), Marylin Eade (ALP), Paul Scobie (ALP)
Against: -
Absent: Aaron Buman (Ind), Barbara Gaudry (ALP), Sonia Hornery (ALP)

Councillor details can be found here.

07 November 2006

Newcastle leads on climate change

Tuesday, 7 November 2006

Earlier tonight, Newcastle City Council passed a strong motion on climate change. The motion (moved Michael Osborne, seconded Keith Parsons) says:

Newcastle City Council recognises the urgent need to protect local and global environments from increasing greenhouse gas emissions and to reduce Newcastle’s role in that increase.

Therefore Newcastle City Council:

1. Recommends that the NSW Government establishes a cap on coal exports from Newcastle at existing levels.

2. Recommends that the NSW Government initiates an independent Inquiry into the environmental, social and economic sustainability of the current coal industry and proposed expansion of the Hunter Valley coal industry.

3. Recommends that pending such an Inquiry, the NSW Government initiates a moratorium on new coal mine approvals at Anvil Hill and elsewhere in NSW.

4. Calls on the NSW and Federal Governments to establish a mandatory renewable energy target of 25% by 2020, with 20% by 2014 as a first step, in keeping with targets set by the South Australian Government.

5. Calls on the NSW Government to establish a contribution of 10c/tonne on coal exports through the Port of Newcastle to fund a community trust to be administered through Hunter Councils, to support a transition to a clean energy economy in the Hunter and to invest in local renewable energy projects.

6. Calls on the NSW Government to build a more efficient public transport system in the Hunter, linking major regional cities defined in the Lower Hunter Regional Strategy.

Council also resolved to consider the provision of safer, more efficiently networked series of cycling routes in the Newcastle LGA in the context of an upcoming infrastructure workshop.

Hopefully, the State and Federal Governments will take notice and act.

The full text of the background material can be found here.

Business as usual in NSW

This afternoon, I attended the round-table meeting at the Newcastle City Hall organised by the Panel set up by the Planning Minister to look at the proposed new coal loader.

The proposal is for a new Coal Export Terminal on Kooragang Island for the export of up to 66 million tones per annum of coal. The Planning Minister, Mr Frank Sartor, has appointed an "Independent Panel of Experts" under very limited Terms of Reference, which do not mentioned the climate impacts of what this coal loader would be doing.

This is despite NSW being a signatory to the Intergovernment Agreement on the Environment 1st May 1992 that outlines that NSW needs to ensure that there is a proper examination of matters which significantly affect the environment (clause 3.4), that decisions need to take into account the precautionary principle and intergenerational equity (clause 3.5) and that the parties acknowledge the potentially significant impact of greenhouse enhanced climate change on Australia's natural, social and working environment (Schedule 5).

Has Mr Sartor read this agreement?

Mr Sartor has appointed 3 men to the Panel: Mr Kearns (Chair), the Deputy Chief, Business Integration at CSIRO - Mr D'Abreton, an air quality consultant - and Mr Gross, a noise consultant.

The Panel is meeting downstairs in City Hall tomorrow and Thursday.

Clean, green, job rich future



Newcastle Greens
MEDIA RELEASE
7 November 2006


Greens give Stern message: bin proposed Newcastle coal loader

Greens MP Lee Rhiannon is in Newcastle today to address a panel of independent experts, appointed to consider the proposed Newcastle coal loader. The Greens message is that climate change gives the government no choice but to reject the development.

"The world has woken up the threat of climate change and the government cannot afford to back a coal export terminal which will drive the expansion of coal mining in the Hunter, Gloucester and Gunnedah regions," mining spokesperson Lee Rhiannon said.

"I will ask the independent experts appointed by the Minister for Planning to think of their personal and professional responsibility to consider the implications of this decision for the lives of future generations.

"No where does the approval process for the coal loader ask for consideration to be given to the impact of the proposed coal loader on climate change. The Greens will ask the expert panel to look beyond these very limited terms of reference.

"A CSIRO climate change report released yesterday predicts temperatures in NSW could rise by more than 6 degrees by 2070 and rain levels could fall by 40 percent.

"The CSIRO report holds dire climate change predictions for the Namoi Valley, one of the areas being eyed off by the coal industry and which will feed the new coal loader.

"The Stern report shows us that a price can be placed on the damage brought by climate change. This price must be factored into any perceived economic benefits the coal loader may bring.

"A new coal loader flies in the face of the Stern report's advice to the world to produce cleaner energy to ensure non-fossil fuels account for 60% of energy output by 2050," Ms Rhiannon said.

Councillor Michael Osborne, Greens candidate for Newcastle said, "Climate change and this government's muddleheaded support for expansion of the coal industry is a major concern for the people of Newcastle and the Lower Hunter.

"Our regional economy risks collapse in coming decades as the world works to reduce its dependence on fossil fuels.

"The Hunter region cannot afford to be locked into a coal dependent future. The government needs to end its business as usual approach to the coal industry and draw up plans for a clean, green, job rich future for the area," Clr Osborne said.

Costa’s reversing the Carr

Media Release
Monday 6 November 2006

If Howard’s asleep at the wheel, then Costa’s reversing the Carr.

Morris Iemma’s claim that his Government is ‘getting on with practical solutions to climate change’ is laughable, according to NSW Upper House Greens MP Ian Cohen.

“The Premier quite rightly accuses John Howard of being asleep at the wheel on climate change, but this does not entitle him to deflect responsibility for his Government’s own failings,” Mr Cohen said.

“The final draft of the NSW Government’s State Plan is imminent. The previous draft mentioned greenhouse gas emissions targets as a good idea but did not specify any.

“If they are serious about climate change this plan will contain a mandated target of at least 20% of our energy being sourced from renewables by 2020.

“It will also outline exactly what targets they have in mind for reducing NSW’s greenhouse gas emissions.

“The people of NSW and Australia are sick of the Federal and State Governments bickering over climate change. We need to know what each of them plans to do, rather than using the other’s inaction as a smokescreen for their own.

“Morris Iemma has no control over John Howard. He does have control over greenhouse gas emissions in NSW, and this requires him to also have control over his climate sceptic coal obsessed treasurer.

“Coal fired power is responsible for over 40% of Australia’s greenhouse gas emissions, and NSW is the worst offender.

“Michael Costa repeatedly scoffs at renewable energy and defends the polluting coal industry. If The Premier wants his Government to be seen as serious about climate change then he must not only implement realistic and effective targets, but also rein in his recalcitrant treasurer,” Mr Cohen said.

Federal nuclear power ban

Monday, 6 November 2006
Minister unaware of own nuclear power ban

The Minister for Finance, who also represents Prime Minister Howard, Senator Nick Minchin, was unaware that his own government banned nuclear power stations (and enrichment plants) in 1998.

Greens Leader Bob Brown asked the Minister about the ban in question time today. The ban was legislated in the Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Act 1998 (page 3, section 10 "Prohibition on certain nuclear installations")

Senator Brown said that the act was passed six years after the Rio Earth Summit agreement to tackle climate change.

"Before the Howard government proceeds with nuclear power stations or uranium enrichment, it will have to reverse its own ban," Senator Brown said.

Senator Minchin confirmed Senator Brown's claim after question time.

06 November 2006

Secret levy revealed



Newcastle Greens
MEDIA RELEASE
6 November 2006


FOI uncovers secret State Govt parking levy

Documents obtained under Freedom of Information reveal that the State Government is preparing a proposal to introduce a $450 parking space levy in the Newcastle CBD.

“At a time when the Sydney-appointed Labor candidate has begun attacking Newcastle Council over parking in the CBD, it has been revealed that the Sydney Labor Government has been secretly preparing a proposal to introduce a parking levy of $450 per space per year,” the Greens candidate for the state seat of Newcastle, Cr Michael Osborne, said today.

“The documents obtained under FOI relate to a consultancy by firm McCormack, Rankin, Cagney to develop a Lower Hunter Integrated Transport Plan. They are dated March 2005 and show that the Ministry of Transport was preparing a ‘proposal regarding the introduction of a (Category 2) Parking Space Levy (PSL) in the Newcastle CBD’.

“The Sydney Labor Government needs to come clean about whether they are going to impose this secret tax or not. And the Sydney-appointed Labor candidate for Newcastle should be honest with the electorate about whether she agrees with this additional impost on Newcastle people.

“If she doesn’t agree, what is she going to do about it?

“Have her Sydney minders told her about this secret tax? And when is it going to be announced to the Newcastle people – after the State election?” Cr Osborne asked.

***

Parking Levy information from Ministry of Transport website

Parking space levies were originally introduced in the Sydney CBD and North Sydney/Milsons Point. In June 2000, the areas were extended to Bondi Junction, Chatswood, Parramatta and St Leonards. Each of these areas are referred to as Category 2 areas, while Sydney CBD and North Sydney/Milsons Point are referred to as Category 1 areas.

The rate of levy per space per year in Category 2 areas is set at $450, while the rate of levy per space in Category 1 areas is $900. In accordance with the Act these levies are increased each year with CPI (Sydney). Fees are collected by the NSW Office of State Revenue (OSR), a branch of the NSW State Treasury, on behalf of the NSW Ministry of Transport. An owner of off-street parking spaces within one of the six designated PSL areas must register with OSR, and make PSL payments to OSR on the basis of their liability.

Refer Ministry of Transport

05 November 2006

Renewable energy wanted

Yesterday, over 900 people braved a cold, wet day on Nobby’s Beach to protest the need for urgent political action to address climate change.

We spelt out "BEYOND COAL..!" (I was part of the dot on the exclamation mark!)

It was truly inspiring to see so many people, from all walks of life, young and old. Jane Smith, Greens candidate for Charlestown, was there, as was Bryce Gaudry, MP for Newcastle.

Sydney-appointed Labor candidate Jodi McKay wasn't seen and neither was conservative independent Cr John Tate.

Jodi McKay was seen a few days earlier at a fundraiser to raise money for the Newcastle Businessmen's Club so they could buy a $30,000 air conditioner! Now that's a climate action!

03 November 2006

Clean up democracy

I heard that the Lake Macquarie Local Govt committee of the Labor party have adopted Greens policy and will ban the acceptance of developer donations!

Well done!

I hope that they will also not accept developer donations channelled through the numerous "front" organisations like the Canberra Labor Club Ltd, John Curtin House Ltd, The Chifley Research Centre Ltd, Emily's List Australia or the various State and Federal branches.

If only Sydney Labor listened to the locals.

You may see also on this site that I've called on the candidates for the State seat of Newcastle to pledge that would not accept developer donations, either directly or indirectly. See No developer donations pledge.

Design comp - Iemma's Dilemma

Design competition - Iemma's Dilemma

“How can I make it seem like I’m doing something about climate change, without actually doing anything”. This is the dilemma facing Morris Iemma as he attempts to spin his way out of climate change action.

Greenpeace are calling on designers and satirists to help send a clear message to Morris Iemma that we need urgent action to prevent climate change – not just spin. Greenpeace want your designs, images, cartoons and animations that speak to the heart of Iemma’s Dilemma. Be blunt and to point. Choose freely from a wide suite of tools - ridicule, satire, parody and mockery.

See the website for more info: Design Competition. Submission must be in by Friday 1st December.

Stop Uranium

Last month, the Greens screened their first anti-nuclear advertisement during the SBS 9:30pm news. Check out the ad at Stop Uranium Export, you can also help put the ad to air by donating directly online.

No developer donations



Newcastle Greens
MEDIA RELEASE
3 November 2006

Greens invite candidates to pledge: No developer donations

The Newcastle Greens candidate for the state seat of Newcastle, Cr Michael Osborne, today called on the other two candidates for the seat of Newcastle Cr John Tate and Jodi McKay to pledge that they would not accept donations from developers in the upcoming State election.

“Nobody believes that donations from developer are about philanthropy. In fact, it is a misnomer to even call them donations. They are not donations, they are purchases. Developers are buying influence, they are buying access, and they are buying government policy,” Mr Osborne said.

“The Newcastle Greens will not accept donations from developers.

“Today, I call on John Tate and Jodi McKay to pledge that they too will not accept donations from developers, either directly or indirectly,” Mr Osborne said.

The Macquarie Dictionary defines "bribe" as "anything given or serving to persuade or induce". To suggest that developer donations are not given in order "to persuade or induce" is akin to asking us to believe in the tooth fairy.

It was reported in the Sydney Morning Herald (1 November 2006) that:
The ALP has held several fund-raisers targeted at the property industry this year. The Minister for Planning, Frank Sartor, packed out the ballroom of the Westin hotel, and there have been several intimate dinners with ministers.

Research by the Greens on developer donations shows the NSW Labor Party has raised $8.78 million from the property sector since 1998-99, and the NSW Liberals and Nationals received $6.35 million.

The Greens Lee Rhiannon introduced a private members bill into the NSW Parliament in 2004 to ban donations from developers. The bill was voted down when the Labor and Liberal parties voted together.

Donations by developers can be searched at The Greens Democracy4Sale website (Democracy 4 sale), which is based on official electoral funding returns.

02 November 2006

Nuclear: the non-alternative

Some people may have read Dr Colin Keay’s article in today’s Newcastle Herald arguing for nuclear power.

Dr Keay is a long-time advocate of nuclear power, who has been writing similar articles supporting nuclear power for many decades.

Dr Keay’s argument relies on a long list of examples of countries already committed to the nuclear option. He begins with Canada, where, he argues, the citizens of Toronto are “quite comfortable with the fact that they have eight power reactors quietly producing electricity at Pickering, a locality just a few kilometres along the shores of Lake Ontario from the outskirts of Toronto”.

The truth is that Pickering’s nuclear facilities have been plagued by political, administrative, financial and technical problems and many Canadians are anything but comfortable with these reactors, as the following websites demonstrate:

Energy Probe

Sierra Club

Scratch beneath the surface of the other examples that Dr Keay uses to support his pro-nuclear argument, and you find similar errors and distortions.

He claims, for example, that adopting nuclear power enabled France to close its last coal mine. The truth is that France has such small reserves of coal that the industry was economically doomed whatever energy future the country chose. The French went nuclear not because they wanted to give up coal, but because they felt they had to: “no oil, no gas, no coal, no choice”, the French say.

Given what we now know about the potential of alternative renewable energy, whether the French really did have “no choice” is very much open to question.

But Australia – with its vast resources of wind, sun and space – does have choices other than the high risk, minimal return nuclear option. With active and positive government support, innovative industry approaches and creative research and development, we have the choice of making a just transition to energy-saving and alternative energy producing technologies that will allow us to kick the coal habit without going nuclear.

Despite a fear campaign to the contrary, the “Just Transition” strategy supported by The Greens is not about an immediate switch-off from coal. What we advocate is no further expansion of the coal industry, and its gradual replacement with renewable energy sources and technologies, including appropriate social and economic restructuring support by governments for people in coal-dependent communities, to provide the basis for a sustainable economy and jobs.

See Hunter Just Transition Fund.

The great Achilles heel of the nuclear industry, of course, is the problem of what to do with nuclear waste. Dr Keay assures us that “solutions are now in sight” for this. The problem is that these solutions have been just around the corner for as long as most of us can remember.

Even if Australia were foolish enough to take up the nuclear option, a nuclear plant would not be functioning for about ten years (in fact, the long lead time for development and construction is well known as one of the key financial risk factors with nuclear power plants).

We just can’t afford to wait that long for a technology that is too costly, too risky, and offers only a minimal contribution to meeting our energy needs or to solving the Climate Change challenge.

Nuclear is not a real option.

Read ACF President Prof Ian Lowe’s argument about nuclear power at Why Nuclear Power Won’t Stop Climate Change

Special rules for Frank

Minister wants Parliament to allow him not to consider the environment under the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act

Amendments to the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EP&A) before NSW parliament seek to prevent thorough assessment of greenhouse gas emissions and the impacts this will have on the environment of NSW.

What is going on?

These changes will mean that development proponents will no longer have to comply with Environmental Assessment Requirements under the controversial Part 3A of the EP&A.

* Part 3A already gives the Planning Minister a disturbing degree of discretionary power, and removes many avenues for legal challenge of the Minister’s decisions. These amendments will completely remove the requirement for proponents to even assess the development’s impacts.

* This will affect projects far beyond Anvil Hill, and will remove the need for any Part 3A project to thoroughly assess environmental impacts.

* The Government is facing a legal challenge regarding the Anvil Hill coal mine proposal. The challenge seeks to ensure that the climate change impacts on the environment and community of NSW are fully assessed.

* Frank Sartor introduced the amendments this week, claiming that they were “housekeeping measures” but they will nullify the court challenge by removing the requirement for the Minister to consider any environmental assessment.

The amendments will affect all Major Projects.
* Specific transitional arrangements in the amending Bill ensure that all projects that have approval pending will be affected by these changes. That means Anvil Hill, and dozens of other Major Projects, and if passed it will affect all developments declared as Major Projects from now on.

* In order to avoid assessing the full impacts of Anvil Hill, the Government is winding back 25 years of planning law, and is disregarding the public interest, and even public safety.

* Companies undertaking Major Projects, like chemical plants or mines, are currently required to undertake assessment within parameters set out by the Government. Following these changes, they will be able to write Environmental Assessments, if they write them at all, that do not discuss dangerous or destructive impacts of their project.

Arrogance Sydney Labor-style.

Unions and Greens unite

Wednesday 1 November 2006
Unions and Greens unite to protest WorkChoices

The NSW Greens, the CFMEU and the NSW Teachers Federation joined forces tonight as hosts of a public forum to highlight the serious attack presented by Howard's workplace laws on Australia's basic human rights.

Andrew Ferguson, Secretary of the NSW CFMEU said, 'the plight of the 107 construction workers in Western Australia who currently face prosecution and fines of $28,600 for defending their union delegate from victimisation is evidence of the brutal hand of WorkChoices".

"Howard's laws are a fundamental attack on the rights of workers to organise, take collective action and to be represented by effective unions. These are human rights enshrined in international law, taken away by Howard to curry favour with employers across Australia."

Deputy Lord Mayor of Sydney Chris Harris said, "the Greens are intent on uniting with the unions and the community to bolster the ongoing campaign against WorkChoices".

"Working together is the best way to win back the working and living conditions that unions have established over the past century".

Greens MP and industrial relations spokesperson Lee Rhiannon said, "overturning Howard's laws will be a key campaign aim for the Greens in the upcoming NSW and federal elections.

"Highlighting the full impact of these regressive workplace laws is a central plank of the Greens campaign to help defeat Howard and win back the Senate in 2007".

Forum details: 'Leave your human rights at the door at the door:
The workplace in Howard's Australia' was held at the NSW Teachers Federation Auditorium with the following speakers:
- John Robertson - Secretary, Unions NSW
- Maree O'Halloran - President Teachers Federation
- Bernadette Peters - Partner of prosecuted WA worker
- Clr Chris Harris - Greens, Deputy Lord Mayor, City of Sydney
- Andrew Ferguson - Secretary, NSW CFMEU

01 November 2006

Coincidence?

Post hoc, ergo...

The Howard government's mogul-friendly media laws - relaxing cross media and foreign ownership restrictions - pass through the Senate with the crucial support of Christian fundamentalist Senator Steve Fielding.

Two weeks later, John Howard announces a scheme to publicly fund Chaplains for private and public schools.

Coincidence?

Doughnuts for all



Newcastle Greens
MEDIA RELEASE
29 October 2006


Labor’s doughnut the shape of things to come

The weekend revelation that Sydney’s Labor powerbrokers are determining exactly what their Newcastle Labor candidate says to the media offers a glimpse into how the Labor candidate would be handled if she were elected in March, the Greens candidate for Newcastle, Cr Michael Osborne, said today.

“Whilst Ms McKay’s first media release is just a stale doughnut (a generic media release filled in with the local candidate’s name), it’s what the document doesn’t say that is most significant.

“It tells us with absolute clarity exactly who is calling the tune in the case of Ms McKay. This reinforces the fact that she’s been hand picked to represent Sydney Labor.

Cr Osborne said it was understandable that Sydney Labor powerbrokers had become desperate to have Ms McKay say something to Newcastle voters other than empty cliches about ‘doing it for Newcastle’.

“We still haven’t heard a single significant policy statement from Ms McKay," Cr Osborne said.

“After this latest embarrassment, she owes it to Newcastle voters more than ever to tell us what she believes in, and what her position is on key local issues.

“Where does the Sydney appointed candidate stand on the Royal Newcastle hospital site; does she support a twenty storey tower?

“Does she advocate keeping the rail line into the city? Or does she want it sold off to developers?

“Will she get the State Government to stop the Botany Bay expansion to bring forward the multi-purpose terminal for Newcastle?

“Does she support a planning strategy which will result in up to 10,000 hectares of bush being knocked over for development?

“Does she support Minister Costa and his scepticism about climate change?

“We need an advocate for the people of this city – not someone who is a mouthpiece for the powerbrokers in Sydney.”

27 October 2006

Gnomes at bottom of garden

Gnomes at the bottom of the garden

Some in the State Government, like Minister Costa, don't think they should be doing anything about climate change...

well...

Climate change is happening and all spheres of government need to show leadership.

Scientists are now in agreement that climate change is happening, that it is happening faster than predicted and that it will affect us all. [Third Assessment Report 2001 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)]

There is no scientific disagreement that human-induced climate change is the greatest threat to life on earth, and that the major contributor is carbon dioxide. Climate change is caused by increased amounts of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere from human activities, particularly burning fossil fuels such as coal, oil and gas. These increased amounts of greenhouse gases including carbon dioxide are sent into the atmosphere, trapping heat from the sun and wrapping a hot blanket around the earth in the same way that a greenhouse captures the sun’s warmth.

Carbon dioxide levels have increased from 280 parts per million (ppm) in 1750 to over 375 ppm today – higher than any previous levels that can be reliably measured (that is, in the last 420,000 years). [Third Assessment Report 2001 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)]

Even the most cautious assessment by the Australian Government points to CO² emissions as the major cause of climate change: “The current rate of increase in CO² in the atmosphere is unlikely to have been experienced during at least the 20,000 years and is the most likely explanation along with other greenhouse gases for climate change” . [Climate Change Q&A Greenhouse Office Dept of Environment and Heritage 2006]

Increasing greenhouse gases are causing temperatures to rise; the Earth’s surface warmed by approximately 0.6 centigrade degrees over the twentieth century. [Joint Science Academies Statement on Climate Change G 8 plus Brazil, China and India June 2005]

These increased temperatures are beginning to melt the world’s stored ice, warming the oceans, causing sea levels to rise, drowning islands and flooding coastal areas.

Burning coal is the big climate change contributor.

Australians have the dubious honour of being ranked first in producing the most greenhouse emissions per capita in the world at 27.9 tonnes annually, more than double the average of 12.8 tonnes per person for all industrialised countries. [Australians Worst Greenhouse Polluters Clive Hamilton, The Australia Institute August 2002]

Nationally we send more than 530 million tonnes of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere each year, of which 71% is the by-product of stationary energy produced by coal-fired power stations.

In NSW, 90% of the state’s electricity comes from coal-fired power stations [NSW Dept of Energy, Utilities and Sustainability Sept 2006], with six of the eight coal fired power stations located in the Hunter region of NSW. There is a limited amount of ‘green power’ produced in the form of wind, biomass and hydro electricity.

It is recognised that the CSIRO Energy Centre in Newcastle provides a focal point in Australia for energy research in the fields of sustainable energy, environmental impacts of energy and cost-competitive and environmentally-acceptable fuel research and development.

Newcastle is the world’s largest coal export port.

The world’s atmosphere does not recognise whether the coal is burnt in the Hunter or anywhere else in the world.

Seventy seven (77) million tonnes of coal is sent overseas from Newcastle every year.

For every tonne of coal burnt, 3.7 tonnes of carbon dioxide is sent into the atmosphere. [Factors and Methods Workbook, Australian Greenhouse Office Dec 2005 p32]

Expanding the Hunter coal industry will directly increase Australia’s current contribution to global warming and climate change. The current proposal before the NSW State Government for a third Coal Export Terminal on Newcastle Harbour will send up to another 66 million tonnes of coal overseas every year sourced from proposed new coal mines in the Hunter Valley and the Gunnedah basin.

Climate change will affect everyone, including Newcastle residents.

Apart from the reported impacts of climate change on the Hunter wine industry and horse stud industry, climate change will affect Novocastrians by :

* increasing the variability and potency of storms, floods, droughts and other weather disasters
* affecting water resources, stream flows and groundwater recharge, which will in turn affect our food supply, health and industry
* rising sea levels could inundate areas of the Newcastle LGA, including residential areas
* impacting on our threatened species and ecosystems, including our Internationally-recognised wetlands and salt marshes
* posing incalculable economic risks for the future, which far outweigh the economic risks of taking action today – Munich Re, the largest re-insurance company in the world, has estimated that climate change will cost the global economy $300 billion per annum by 2050 if action is not taken [Quoted by Ian Lowe, address to the National Press Club 2005].
* threatening the health of future generations through increased disease, freshwater shortages and worsened air pollution

The Australian medical profession is concerned about the effects of climate change on human health. The Australian Medical Association’s (AMA) position in favour of renewable energy is clearly stated on its website: “The AMA believes that human health is ultimately dependent on the health of the planet and its ecosystem. The AMA believes it is possible to mitigate the possible consequential health effects of climate change through improved energy efficiency, clean energy production and other emission reduction steps.” [Australian Medical Association ]

Newcastle City Council has made great progress towards becoming a sustainable city through the use of bio-diesel in council vehicles, energy and water efficiency measures and its push to become one of Australia’s Solar Cities. The effect of these initiatives will be undone if the Hunter-based coal industry is expanded.

Action to transition away from coal burning is needed

Scientists tell us we have only 10 years to make the shift away from climate-changing fossil fuels to sustainable, renewable energy if we wish to prevent climate disaster. [“I think we have a very brief window of opportunity to deal with climate change … no longer than a decade, at the most” James E Hansen Director of NASA’s Goddard Institute of Space Studies quoted in various US media including WorldNet Daily September 15 2006.]

All our efforts need to be directed to achieving this major shift in our energy sources.

Many energy savings could be made with emphasis on investment and subsidies for efficient and renewable energy backed by government policy at all levels.

There will be no loss of jobs in the coal industry from preventing its expansion. There is, however, the potential to create thousands more jobs from investment in the renewables industry .

We cannot afford to wait for solutions that do not recognise the continuing impact of sending carbon into the atmosphere every day, drawing the planet rapidly to the ‘tipping point’.

The Precautionary Principle, enshrined in the Local Government Act, states that where there are threats of serious or irreversible environmental damage, lack of full scientific certainty should not be used as a reason for postponing measures to prevent environmental degradation.

Climate change is happening and it is critical that the Government commit to a “just transition” away from coal dependency for Hunter communities, to support job creation and the retraining and the seeding of new sustainable industries paid for by a levy on existing coal mines.

Action on Climate Change

International Day of Action on Climate Change

WALK AGAINST WARMING
SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 4th


in Newcastle, Maitland and Sydney

All are urged to join this growing movement demanding deep cuts in greenhouse gas emissions through:
* Renewable energy guarantees
* No new coal fired power or mines
* Better public transport

You can participate in either the NEWCASTLE or MAITLAND events, in view of the significance of our port being the largest coal exporter in the southern hemisphere. Help stop expansion of the coal industry and campaign for clean, renewable energy.

NEWCASTLE EVENT:

The recently-formed group, Climate Action Newcastle, is organising an event on Nobbys Beach (rather than a walk). They are asking you to join together to make a huge human sign on the beach, reading:
BEYOND COAL ... RENEWABLES.

To achieve this, at least 800 people are needed. So as well as yourself, please bring your family, friends, colleagues and neighbours.

Assemble at 1.00 pm (for a 2.00 pm photo shoot of the display), at the Surf Lifesaving Club end of Nobbys Beach.

It would help if people intending to come could register beforehand.
Please phone 8588 1260 to leave a message.

For further information contact: Vicki Brooke, ph. 0425 243 860.

MAITLAND EVENT:

Assemble 10.00 am at Maitland Post Office
Bring: family, friends, kids & placards for a fun walk ending at Maitland Park with speakers and entertainment. Prizes for Best Slogan, Best Placard, Best Decorated Parasol.
Coordinated through the Nature Conservation Council and Maitland Greens.
For further information: Ph. 4933 2624

SYDNEY EVENT:

Assemble 11.00 am, Martin Place - walk to Botanic Gardens

Supported on the day by:
Mel and Kochie - Sunrise, Channel 7
Kylie Kwong - Celebrity Chef
Uniting Church Reverend Elenie Poulis
Australian Greens Senator Bob Brown
John Robertson, Secretary, Unions NSW
Jennie George, Federal Member for Throsby

.... and The Stiff Gins

The Government will only take real action on climate change and protect our kids' futures if you tell them to. Join thousands of other Australians in a peaceful walk urging action non climate change NOW.

For further information: walk against warming